A US Appeals Court Let AI Shopping Agents Back Onto Amazon
The Ninth Circuit vacated the injunction against Perplexity's agent, holding that the user is the one accessing Amazon. The lawsuit itself continues.
Guilherme Hortinha · 6 August 2026
Check whether your business and market can run ChatGPT Ads.
The Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the preliminary injunction that kept Perplexity's shopping agent off Amazon, finding Amazon unlikely to succeed on its claim under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The court's reasoning turned on attribution: when the agent inside Perplexity's Comet browser logs in and places an order, it is the user accessing Amazon.
How it got here
In March, Judge Maxine Chesney in a federal California court granted a temporary injunction, finding strong evidence that Perplexity had accessed password-protected accounts with the user's permission and without Amazon's authorisation, and ordered Perplexity to delete copies of Amazon data.
Amazon argued that third-party AI should operate transparently through established APIs, pointing to its own Buy For Me and Rufus tools, and alleged security risks plus ignored cease-and-desist demands.
Perplexity's position was that an agent acting on a user's behalf carries the same rights as the person, and it characterised Amazon's stance as bullying.
The appeals court vacated the injunction only. The underlying case has not been decided.
What this means for you
The procedural outcome matters less than the reasoning. If a court treats an agent following a user's instruction as that user, then a retailer's ability to keep agents out rests on product and contract decisions rather than on computer-misuse law. That reading is now on the record from a federal appeals court, and it will be cited.
For anyone selling online, the practical question this raises is whether your own site is navigable by an agent at all. Logged-in flows, cart steps that depend on hover states, checkouts gated behind a challenge that only a human passes: each one is a place where an assistant shopping on your customer's behalf gives up and goes to a competitor that is easier to transact with.
Amazon's own answer to agents is to ship its own. That option is available to very few retailers, which makes agent-readiness the realistic version of the same strategy.
Frequently asked questions
Did the court rule that AI agents are legal on Amazon?+
No. It vacated a preliminary injunction, holding Amazon unlikely to succeed on its Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim because the user, rather than Perplexity, is the one accessing Amazon. The lawsuit continues.
What is Comet?+
Perplexity's browser. It contains the shopping agent that logs into a customer's account and places orders on their behalf.
See which brands ChatGPT recommends to your buyers right now.
Explore with AI
[ Keep exploring ]

Co-founder & Head of AI Innovation, Index Lab
Guilherme co-founded Index Lab, an AEO/GEO agency that makes brands the answer AI gives across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, taking clients from zero AI visibility to top recommendations.
[ Related reading ]
Listicles still dominate Google's top 10, but the winners keep turning over
New research on 3,000 ranking listicles finds the format never left. What changed is which URL wins, and what makes one listicle outrank another.
Read →NewsGoogle AI Mode picks different sellers than the shopping carousel
New tracking data finds AI Mode overlaps with Google's own product carousel only 1.28% of the time, and swaps in a different top seller for 49.6% of the matches it does find.
Read →NewsProduct pages beat Reddit for AI citations, but the data is B2B only
Ten Speed's study found product pages draw 24.1% of AI citations against 4.2% for Reddit, YouTube and forums combined, and the number survived six fact-check questions. The dataset behind it is B2B SaaS and professional services clients only.
Read →See where your brand stands in AI.
Free visibility check →