Five French publisher groups add AI Overviews evidence to the EU's Google probe
CPA, FNPS, GESTE, SEPM and SPIIL have taken their case to the European Commission. One version of their statement objects to the visibility of brands, which reaches past newsrooms to any business found through Google.
Guilherme Hortinha · 1 November 2026
Can your business run ChatGPT Ads? Check in 10 seconds.
Five French publishing organisations have filed a complaint with the European Commission over how Google launched AI Overviews and AI Mode in France, PPC Land reports. The signatories are the CPA, the FNPS, GESTE, the SEPM and the SPIIL. They announced it in a joint statement dated October 29, 2026.

The complaint joins an existing case. It adds French evidence to the antitrust investigation the Commission opened on December 9, 2025, under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. If an infringement is established, fines can reach 10% of Google's global annual revenue.
What is public, and what is held back
Google switched on both features in France on July 22, 2026. The complaint arrived 99 days later, by PPC Land's count.
The groups say France's late launch let them document Google's practices from the first day.
The complaint itself is unpublished. The statement carries no traffic figures, names no member companies and quotes no spokesperson.
It names no remedy, asks for no interim measures and proposes no payment model.
For now, this is a coalition forming. The groups have not released the evidence on what AI Overviews did to French traffic, so nobody outside the Commission can test it yet.
The line that reaches beyond publishers
The CPA is a collective of digital marketing businesses. It is the only signatory whose name refers to marketing. The version of the statement on GESTE's website lists concerns about "the visibility of content and brands" (translated from French), alongside inbound traffic and publishers' business models. The version that circulated under the five logos mentions visibility without the word brands. The source does not say which wording the Commission received.
That wording matters to anyone who gets found through Google. It treats AI Overviews as a question of which brands an answer shows, and also of which sites lose clicks. Any remedy on how Google uses and credits web content would change which sources AI answers draw on. Brands are part of that question.
What to do with this
The source gives no timetable for a decision. The Commission already has other complaints on file, including one the European Publishers Council filed on February 10, 2026. Nothing about how AI Overviews picks its sources changes today.
You can still copy what the French groups did and record the baseline now. Track how often your brand appears in AI answers for the queries that matter to you. If a ruling changes how Google cites sources, you will be able to measure the effect.
Frequently asked questions
What did the five French organisations file?+
A complaint to the European Commission about how Google deployed AI Overviews and AI Mode in France. The statement is dated October 29, 2026. The complaint itself has not been published.
Does this open a new case against Google?+
No. It feeds evidence into the antitrust investigation the Commission opened on December 9, 2025, under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
What fines could Google face?+
If an infringement is established, fines can reach 10% of Google's global annual revenue.
Why does this matter to businesses that are not publishers?+
One signatory, the CPA, represents digital marketing businesses. The web version of the statement objects to effects on 'the visibility of content and brands', which covers any business that depends on being found through Google Search.
Have the groups published traffic data?+
No. The statement carries no traffic figures and no list of affected sites. It does not name a remedy either.
Which brands does ChatGPT name for your buyers' questions?
Explore with AI
[ Keep exploring ]
Terms in this article

Co-founder & Head of AI Innovation, Index Lab
Guilherme co-founded Index Lab, an AEO/GEO agency that makes brands the answer AI gives across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, taking clients from zero AI visibility to top recommendations.
[ Related reading ]
OpenAI commits to a shared robots.txt signal for AI training opt-outs
OpenAI will honor a common robots.txt signal for foundational AI training preferences, built in the IETF AI Preferences working group. It has not shipped yet, and OpenAI's existing crawler controls stay in place.
Read →NewsOpenAI's Aura safety check can block ChatGPT agents from your site with no trace in your logs
A documented case shows a well-known publisher with open robots.txt rules blocked by an internal OpenAI classification, with no public reason given and no self-service review.
Read →NewsGoogle opens Gemini and Search connected apps to outside developers
Google's new Connected Apps Platform lets any U.S. developer on the waitlist submit an app that Gemini and Search can call. It does not say how the AI chooses between two apps that do the same job.
Read →See where your brand stands in AI.
Free visibility check →