Google's John Mueller calls the daily-crawl sitemap trick a bad idea

A technique that appends a changing timestamp to sitemap URLs to force daily recrawling gets a warning from Google's search advocate, because it destabilizes the canonical URL a page needs to be tracked and cited.

Guilherme Hortinha · 3 September 2026

ChatGPT Ads Eligibility

Can your business run ChatGPT Ads? Check in 10 seconds.

The technique

Image: Search Engine Journal.
Image: Search Engine Journal.

Some SEOs have started appending a changing parameter, such as ?v= followed by a Unix timestamp, to the child sitemap URLs inside a sitemap index. The goal is to force search engines to refetch the sitemap file every day, instead of leaving that decision to the <lastmod> field, which normally tells a crawler whether a page has actually changed.

A Bluesky user posting as @seoharbour asked Google's John Mueller about it, describing what they had observed on a large, rigidly structured site, where the child sitemap URLs pick up a fresh timestamp parameter every day.

Mueller calls it a bad idea

Mueller's first reaction was to question the goal: "Why would you use cache-busting in a sitemap file?" After @seoharbour explained the setup, he gave a direct answer: it is "a bad idea." His reasoning was that appending a changing parameter signals that the canonical URL for a piece of content should keep changing. He said that hurts search engines and hurts a site's own tracking, and that stable, clean URLs matter.

What is still unverified

The exchange settles Google's opinion of the practice. It does not settle whether the trick actually increases crawl frequency. Neither Mueller nor Search Engine Journal's reporting states that appending a timestamp changes how often Googlebot visits a page. The outlet frames the whole technique as an SEO influencer hack, something that sounds clever on paper without reflecting how XML sitemaps are meant to work.

Why this matters beyond classic SEO

AI Overviews, Perplexity and ChatGPT's browsing features draw on freshly crawled index data, so crawl frequency is directly tied to how fast new or updated content can surface in AI answers. That is exactly why this technique looked appealing. But the mechanism Google is warning against, a sitemap URL that churns daily, undermines the one thing those systems need to cite a page reliably: a stable identifier for it. Google's advice points the other way. Keep the URL fixed and let <lastmod> carry the freshness signal.

Frequently asked questions

Does the cache-busting trick actually force Google to crawl a page more often?+

The source doesn't say. Mueller's response addresses whether the practice is advisable, not whether it changes crawl frequency, and Search Engine Journal does not report frequency data either.

What does Google recommend instead of cache-busting sitemap URLs?+

Keep the sitemap URL stable and use the <lastmod> field to signal accurately when a page's content actually changed.

Primary sourceSearch Engine Journalsearchenginejournal.com
AI Visibility Check

Which brands does ChatGPT name for your buyers' questions?

[ Keep exploring ]

Terms in this article

Guilherme Hortinha

Guilherme Hortinha

Co-founder & Head of AI Innovation, Index Lab

Guilherme co-founded Index Lab, an AEO/GEO agency that makes brands the answer AI gives across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, taking clients from zero AI visibility to top recommendations.

[ Related reading ]

See where your brand stands in AI.

Free visibility check →